Can
a woman be both a submissive and a feminist?
When
I
published
my
first
BDSM
erotic
romance,
Raw
Silk,
I
sent
a
copy
to
my
brother,
a
sensitive
New
Age
guy
who’s
an
ardent
feminist.
Much
to
my
surprise,
he
was
quite
upset.
“You’re
glorifying
abuse,”
he
said.
“Treating
women
like
objects.
It’s
sexism
at
its
worst.”
I
didn’t expect that reaction. It certainly didn’t match my
experience. BDSM, for me, was liberating. I could finally express the
desires I’d previously kept hidden, knowing I would not be
condemned for them. I certainly didn’t feel abused. No matter what
he did to me, my Master always treated me with respect—even a bit
of awe. I gave myself to him, with full and heartfelt consent. He
understood the value of that gift. I trusted him, and he trusted
me—trusted that I’d let him know if something hurt too much, or
if the emotional content of a scene made me uncomfortable.
Meanwhile,
submission actually increased my self-confidence and assertiveness. I
felt strong and brave after an intense scene, as well as desirable.
And I finally could take ownership of my sexuality, including my
kinky needs.
My
submissive heroines tend to be self-sufficient career women with busy
and fulfilling lives, even before they meet their Doms. Rachel
Zelinsky, from The Gazillionaire and
the Virgin, is a prime example. She’s
founder and CEO of a multi-billion dollar tech corporation. In fact,
she spends her days giving orders to her subordinates. Her need to
submit is an itch she scratches via superficial interactions at kink
clubs. These artificial scenes don’t satisfy her, but she’s too
busy running her company to look for the real thing. Then she meets
Theo, and gradually comes to understand that he can give her what
she’s been missing.
Becoming
Theo’s sub doesn’t diminish her. She remains a powerful,
competent, independent woman who is perfectly capable of holding her
own in the male-dominated world of business. Meanwhile, Theo doesn’t
try to change her. He admires her intelligence, energy and social
savvy.
A
sub is not a doormat. A slave doesn’t have to surrender her
identity, or her pride. Submission is a choice, one that requires
significant courage and honesty. That’s one of the truths I try to
convey in my BDSM fiction, including The Gazillionaire
and the Virgin.
~
~ ~
This
is the last post in my
Gazillionaire
and
Virgin
blog
tour,
running
from
February
1st
to
15th.
Leave
me
a
comment
on
this
post,
including
your
email
address,
and
I’ll
enter
you
to
win
a
$50
bookstore
gift
certificate
(first
prize)
or
a
print
copy
of
the
new
book
(second
prize).
I
hope you’ve enjoyed yourself as much as I have. If you missed some
of the posts, you will find the full
list
here:
I
will wait until Wednesday the 17th
to draw the winners, so you have a bit of time to catch up!
6 comments:
I can relate to your brother's reaction. I had a hard time accepting why someone (especially strong, powerful people, male or female) would enjoy being submissive especially stories where the BDSM is more than just a few scarves and a swat here and there.
acm05atjuno.com
I do not believe they are exclusive. You can be powerful and submissive.
Thank you for the wonderful contest.I loved Raw Silk.
(orelukjp0 at gmail dot com)
I agree with Debby. They can co-exist and allow a person to be more balanced.
magenta 2 red [at] gmail [dot] com
I enjoyed all of the posts, and great excerpts. I am looking forward to reading this story.
jmesparza821 at gmail dot com
A thought provoking post thank you.
marypres(AT)gmail(DOT)com
Post a Comment
Let me know your thoughts! (And if you're having trouble commenting, try enabling third-party cookies in your browser...)