My name is Lisabet, and I write
erotica.
Some readers, I know, will stop right
now, nervous about being subjected to material that might make them
uncomfortable. Don't worry, I promise not to include anything the
least bit explicit in this post. Other readers will nod sagely,
imagining the sort of stories I might produce: lots of body parts and
little if any plot; cardboard characters whose primary
characteristics relate to their bra cup size and genital endowment;
meaningless, anonymous sexual encounters in which the only goal is to
have as many orgasms possible.
That's not erotica. At least, not the
sort of erotica that I write.
I began my publishing career with
erotica. Later, I started writing erotic romance as well. Since I've
joined the romance community, I've found that both authors and
readers sometimes harbor serious misconceptions about my original
genre. Some authors seem eager to draw a line in the sand, insisting
that erotic romance is focused, first and foremost on the
relationship between the characters - that the sex is just added
spice. In contrast, they assert, erotica is focused primarily on sex.
Characters and relationships are of little importance.
That's not the way I see it. For me,
erotica is not even about sex per se. The core concern in an
erotic story is the experience of desire, and how that experience
influences and interacts with a character's personality and actions.
I maintain that it's possible to write erotica that is totally
non-explicit, with no actual sex at all. I'll admit that this sort of
story might not be all that popular, but I've read, and written, a
few.
Erotica - at least the kind of erotica
I enjoy reading and writing - deals first and foremost with the
complex and contradictory emotions associated with sex. This
includes lustful attraction, to be sure, but also guilt, fear, grief,
curiosity, the temptation to take risks, the pride of breaking down
barriers, the joy of sharing pleasure. Not to mention love. Romance
does not have a monopoly on that emotion.
Let me give you an example from my back list. Citadel ofWomen is not a romance, primarily because it lacks an
unequivocally happy ending. Nevertheless, it is a story that is as
much about love, loss and loneliness as about sex. Doa is a strong,
self-confident woman from New York City. When her lover severs their
relationship just before a long-planned trip to Angkor Wat, Doa
stubbornly decides to travel alone. The marvelous sights of the
ancient Khmer empire do little to heal the rift in her heart. Che,
the mercurial young man who serves as her tour guide, offers her
comfort and passion which Doa allows herself to accept. Meanwhile, he
has his own history of terrible loss. Doa and Che connect on a level
that goes far beyond the physical – but how can two people from
such different worlds have a future?
Citadel of Women includes
several sex scenes. The story, however, is about how Doa and Che get
drawn into a sexual relationship, how it changes them, what they
learn about themselves and each other - not about the sex itself.
I'll admit that the story would suffer if the sexual encounters were
not arousing. I truly hope that they are. The rest of the tale
wouldn't be believable if the passion didn't feel real and immediate.
I'll leave you with a short, PG-rated
excerpt from Citadel of Women, which I hope will help make my
point. The physical aspects of sex are uninteresting without a
background of emotional complexity. Truly satisfying erotica requires
three-dimensional characters and serious conflicts, not just bodies.
=================
Dinner was served on the hotel terrace
overlooking a small garden. The moist air was a soft, heavy blanket,
laced with the scents of jasmine and mosquito coils. Two dim bulbs
lit the scene with a golden glow. Our group sat together at a long
table, consuming spicy fish, garlicky vegetables, and mounds of rice.
I sat at the far end, nearest the garden, listening to the
multi-lingual chatter, the clink of silverware, the droning of the
insects in the trees. I had never felt so alone.
All at once, he was there, settling his
loose-limbed frame into the chair across from me. He plunked an amber
bottle misted with condensation down in front of me. “You look like
you could use this.”
He took a swig from his own beer. Not
knowing what to say, I did the same. The icy liquid slid down my
throat.
“Good?”
I nodded and drank again before turning
the bottle to examine the label. “Angkor Beer?” I laughed.
“Why not? One of our leading
exports.” He tilted the bottle back. I watched his brown throat
move as he swallowed. “Possibly the only thing most people know
about our country.”
“Really?” It was difficult to talk
to him, difficult not to stare at his mobile, expressive face.
Fortunately, the beer offered a convenient alternative to
conversation.
We drank for a while in silence. I
wondered how I could politely excuse myself.
He replaced his bottle on the table.
“You really miss her, don't you?”
My eyes filled with tears. Somehow,
though, it was a relief to admit it to someone, even to him. “Yes.
Yes, I do.”
“Is she your lover?” I'd read
Cambodia was a conservative country, but Che didn't seem shocked by
the idea at all.
“Was. She broke it off just before we
were supposed to leave on this trip.”
“Why?” The question was completely
inappropriate, but I could see he wanted to know.
I buried my face in my hands. What
could I say? How could he ever understand?
I heard the scrape of his chair as he
rose. His hand rested briefly on my bare shoulder. “Whatever the
reason,” he murmured, “I think she was crazy.”
By the time I looked up, he had
returned to his seat at the other end of the table. “Make it an
early night,” he told the group. “We've got to be up at five
tomorrow.” He did not look at me again, but still the imprint of
his fingers lingered on my flesh.
2 comments:
Awesome post, Lisabet, thank you. I absolutely love what you have to say about emotion. For both erotica and erotic romance, I often think of the sex scenes as the means by which emotions and characterization are shown. That's what I try to do as a writer. I once saw one of my erotic romances reviewed as full of sex, but unemotional. I thought, either I've failed at writing the sort of sex scenes I wanted to write, or this person separates these two things. To me, erotica especially is about declaring that these two things aren't separate.
I really like what you say above: "Truly satisfying erotica requires three-dimensional characters and serious conflicts, not just bodies."
For me, that's the difference between stories I skim and stories I read, and the characters and conflicts are why erotica still interests me after reading and writing so many stories.
Hi, Annabeth,
It's a cliche but still true: there's no accounting for personal tastes. Perhaps the sex in the story you mention was sufficiently extreme that it made the reviewer uncomfortable and distracted her from the emotional interactions.
Also, in romance, "emotion" pretty much always means "love". Erotica can explore a host of other emotions, including guilt, anger, loneliness, rebellion... the list is almost endless.
Post a Comment
Let me know your thoughts! (And if you're having trouble commenting, try enabling third-party cookies in your browser...)