I have been writing all my life, and publishing for nearly twenty years. Over that time, my work has changed considerably. Of course, I’ve become more adept from a craft perspective, writing more convincing dialogue, curbing my tendency to produce overlong sentences and so on. However, in this post I want to talk about a more fundamental issue—my loss of innocence.
My
early works were naive translations of my favorite fantasies into
prose. I’d had little exposure to erotica as a genre. I wasn’t
following any sort of rules. I wrote what aroused me personally,
without worrying about whether it would have the same effect on
someone else. My heroines were sexually voracious, unapologetically
experimental, brave, curious and eager for new experience. I was like
that myself in those days. The women (and men) in my books were more
so.
As
a consequence, my first three novels, especially (Raw Silk,
Miranda’s Masks and Nasty Business) feature
all sorts of activities and couplings. Taken together, they include
everything from cross-dressing to enemas—voyeurism and
exhibitionism, homosexual and lesbian interactions, group sex, gang
bangs, age play, fisting, golden showers, pegging, femdom,
pseudo-incest, as well as spanking, flogging, bondage and the like. I
wasn’t shy about writing it if it turned me on. And in those early
days, before I’d read and written hundreds of thousands of erotic
words, almost everything did.
I
suspect that many writers of erotica began, like me, by exposing and
exploring their own favorite scenarios of desire. The result is often
searingly sexy. The author has poured his or her personal libidinous
imaginings into the story, with all the accompanying emotions.
Readers pick up on the emotional truth, and react to it. These
self-disclosive stories are direct and intense. They hit you in the
gut, or perhaps more appropriately, in the groin.
Even
as I cringe at the quality of the writing, my early stories still
have an intensity that melts me to a puddle of lust whenever I reread
them.
As
I became more familiar with the world of publishing, my work became
less spontaneous, more consciously constructed. I began writing short
stories to match anthology themes. I contracted with an erotic
romance publisher and discovered that readers didn’t necessarily
share my preference for pan-sexual diversity. Without realizing it, I
acquired the knowledge of good and evil—or rather, marketable
versus not.
My
writing changed in response to this knowledge. I tamed my id to
satisfy editors, reviewers and the public. At the same time, I was
learning how to communicate more effectively through my prose, how to
grab the reader’s attention and keep it focused where I wanted it.
I moved away from writing as confession or self-gratification toward
writing for an imagined audience. I acquired the ability to modify my
style to match the preferences of that audience.
The
market was changing at the same time. The readership for erotic
fiction grew but I think the tolerance for extreme or unusual
activities shrank. My pre-AIDs-era heroines who’d have unprotected
sex with strangers if the mood was right began to seem shocking as
well as old-fashioned. My occasional interest in enemas and golden
showers would make the bulk of the reading community run away
screaming—as well as getting me banned from Amazon.
Perhaps
to compensate for the reduced sexual diversity in any one of my
tales, I began to experiment with different forms. I wrote M/M, F/F,
ménage, paranormal, historical, science fiction, steam punk, in
addition to the BDSM that was my first love. As I’ve matured as a
writer, I’ve gained the confidence to tackle new sub-genres. I even
tried writing a tentacle porn story (“Fleshpot”, currently
available in my dark paranormal collection Fourth World).
My
publishing history makes me proud. I may not be as prolific as some
of my peers, but I’m a far more skillful and accomplished writer
than I was in 1999, when Raw Silk poured out of me in an
excited frenzy. Still, I can’t help looking back with a sense of
nostalgia to the days when reading my own work would leave me
breathless and damp.
I’ve
finally given up on the notion of being financially successful with
my writing, and so I’ve decided to try suspending the censor and
critic, if I can, and writing once more from my loins. I’m not the
same woman I was back then, though. My life-changing initiation into
dominance and submission is thirty years behind me. Memories grow
pale and worn with constant rehearsal. I’m post-menopausal, a state
which gives me new appreciation for the power of hormones. And I’m
pretty well sated from reading erotica by others. It takes an
extraordinary story these days to make an impression.
I’ve
been away from the garden for a long time now. The gates are barred
by time and experience. I have to accept that I may never write my
way back into that state of innocence.
3 comments:
I hope you continue your journey back to the Dark Side and revert to your youthful days of excess. I see erotica as being in two forms, one as romantic with sexual overtones but not over the top and the other erotica for erotica's sake, full of sex. There is little guidance in what your readers want as no one seems to survey erotica. But if I look at best sellers and most popular on SmashWords, it is pretty evident that no one wants bland erotica. They want to be beaten, taken in all 3 holes, peed on, and more. The kinkier the better.
I agree that post-AIDs has changed sex and not for the better. I don't buy into the gotta wear a rubber plot line. We read to escape and you don't escape with a rubber. STD's shouldn't exist in a story unless it's an actual part of a story line. Otherwise we wouldn't have stories with murder and danger in them. While we may not want to be tied to the cross and canned, it is neat to read about.
Follow your thoughts and fantasies - write what moves you.
I think "bland erotica" is an oxymoron.
Thanks for your encouragement (or corruption?) ;^)
While reading this, I found a lot of "me" in those initial years of your writing of erotica. It's what I believe I'm doing. Basically, I have trouble believing there truly are women (yes, I'm all about women) who would actually enjoy all that - well, let's use my euphemism - humiliation.
I don't quite have any idea of what most of the expressions mean: gang bangs, age play, fisting, golden showers, pegging, femdom, pseudo-incest. I can only guess. And what I don't know and trust, I shy away from.
Post a Comment
Let me know your thoughts! (And if you're having trouble commenting, try enabling third-party cookies in your browser...)