Welcome to the 2013 Hop AgainstHomophobia and Transphobia! More than three hundred authors,
publishers and reviewers of LGBTQ-themed literature are joining this
event, which runs from today until the 27th of May. With
our blog posts, comments and giveaways, we're celebrating
International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia (May 17th). Our
goal – to make as many people as possible aware of homophobia's
costs, and to encourage them to honor, not fear, sexual diversity.
Last year's event focused only on M/M
issues. This year we've expanded the scope to include all
orientations under the LGBTQ umbrella, since lesbians, bisexuals and
transexuals suffer from the same types of discrimination and
harassment as gay men.
Our message is the same, though. We are humans first - gay, lesbian, bisexual, straight or queer second. And every human being deserves the same rights, the same freedoms, the same respect. When we condemn or oppress another individual because of his or her orientation, we are not only wronging that individual, but diminishing our own humanity.
Authors of LGBTQ-themed books have a big role to play in reducing homophobia, I believe. When a reader becomes emotionally involved with a LGBTQ character, he or she begins to realize that we're all far more alike than we are different. The greater visibility of gay and lesbian characters in literature and in media, especially characters who don't follow the stereotypes, has led to a greater acceptance of different sexual orientations, and a relaxation (at least in Western countries) of some of the legal and social barriers to equal rights. We authors feed this trend. I'm quite certain that the many women who read M/M romance have played a role in the recent advances in marriage equality, for instance. Slowly but steadily, we're helping to chip away at the old attitudes.
Our message is the same, though. We are humans first - gay, lesbian, bisexual, straight or queer second. And every human being deserves the same rights, the same freedoms, the same respect. When we condemn or oppress another individual because of his or her orientation, we are not only wronging that individual, but diminishing our own humanity.
Authors of LGBTQ-themed books have a big role to play in reducing homophobia, I believe. When a reader becomes emotionally involved with a LGBTQ character, he or she begins to realize that we're all far more alike than we are different. The greater visibility of gay and lesbian characters in literature and in media, especially characters who don't follow the stereotypes, has led to a greater acceptance of different sexual orientations, and a relaxation (at least in Western countries) of some of the legal and social barriers to equal rights. We authors feed this trend. I'm quite certain that the many women who read M/M romance have played a role in the recent advances in marriage equality, for instance. Slowly but steadily, we're helping to chip away at the old attitudes.
I'm personally thrilled by the more
inclusive definition in this year's hop. I write not only M/M erotica and erotic romance
but also lesbian and bisexual stories. I've written a couple of
transexual secondary characters as well, and a tale featuring a
transexual heroine is simmering on my mental back-burner. I also have
a story idea I hope to develop, a science fiction love affair between
a woman and a hermaphrodite. You might say that I write all the
colors of the rainbow.
I'll step into controversial territory
now, though, by saying that I sometimes find LGBTQ readers and
writers less tolerant of diversity than I'd expect. Some M/M readers
refuse to read anything else. I've had fans who love my gay books
tell me that lesbian content is “icky”. Meanwhile, some F/F
authors not only restrict themselves exclusively to tales about women
with women, but also protest that a male could never write convincing
lesbian fiction. I've had gay erotic romance rejected by M/M review
sites because it incorporated half a page of heterosexual
interaction.
Please! Isn't this a kind of reverse
discrimination? In fact the guidelines for this hop exclude M/F
authors. This actually bothers me a bit. Can't an author who focuses
on straight relationships contribute to the effort to erase
homophobia? Don't we need all the help we can get to fight bullying
and secure equal rights for everyone, regardless of their sexual
orientation?
Anyway, my personal preference is to
mix things up in my fiction. My most recent release, Rajasthani
Moon, is primarily a M/F/M title, but it includes a bit
of lesbian sex – first of all, because that fit the story, and
second, because I personally found it arousing. I hesitated before
adding this scene, worrying about alienating some readers. I may pay
for this indulgence in lower sales. But ultimately, it was the right
thing to do and I'll stand by my decision.
All the colors of the rainbow, to me,
means the freedom to explore one's sexual preferences, whatever
direction they might lead, without fear of being ostracized or
otherwise punished. And for me, at least, sexual orientation is
relative and variable. I'm attracted to individuals, not to a
particular gender, and that's the way I write, too.
What do you think about this issue?
Leave me a comment, with your email address. On the 28th,
I'll draw three winners. One will win a copy of my F/F romance
Velvet. One will win a copy of the M/M anthology Gaymes,
which includes my story Crossed
Hearts. And in honor of the third winner, I'll make a $10
contribution to the Lambda Legal Defense Fund:
http://www.lambdalegal.org/
I hope you'll visit at least some of
the other participants in the Hop, too. You'll find links to all
their posts below.
20 comments:
Thank you for taking part in the hop!
In order to combat hatred, we must spread love. Educate others, bring awareness, because every person who has their mind opened is one person closer to a world where homophobia and transphobia doesn’t exist.
kimberlyFDR@yahoo.com
I read everything. Not too fond of menage but I do not care who love whom.
debby236 at gmail dot com
I have to say I agree with the last bit of what you said about discrimination and exclusion of certain content. When I was look through blog hop rules for romance authors I think it's weird that certain genres are excluded. I mean if the blog hop is for Romance or in this case against homophobia and transphobia, why not let any author participate?
As for readers and writers, I can't really blame them for choosing not to read a certain item because it might make them uncomfortable or icked out but I don't think it means they should completely close themselves off to it. I, myself choose not to read F/F or M/M/F but if I was given a free copy or if I bought an anthology with M/M, M/M/F and F/F material in it I wouldn't necessarily skip over those stories. Heck I'm uncomfortable with M/M/M stories but I still keep an open mind to it because I don't want to miss a story that might be able to change my view point on such things.
humhumbum AT yahoo DOT com
I'm always leery of the concept of 'reverse discrimination'. I don't think you can speak of discrimination in terms of forward and reverse. Something is discriminatory or it isn't.
If you write M/F exclusively, you can be an ally, but your work is not part of promoting queer stories and queer content. Accepting the fact that the majority of publishing is focused on heteronormative stories and special emphasis needs to be placed on those stories that are overlooked, isn't discrimination.
It would be discrimination, if for example, a M/M author wasn't allowed because they also wrote M/F. That's saying that you can't be part of the conversation of oppressive homophobia and transphobia because your work also includes stories that benefit from heteronormative privilege. I would have a serious problem with that.
In this case, emphasizing queer content and queer voices is just that, an emphasis. When dealing with a societal minority emphasis is vital for representation, it is not automatically discrimination to focus on the voices that aren't heard over the ones that have dominated the conversation for centuries.
I hope that was clear. I'm not invalidating that you felt uncomfortable by it, I just wanted to explain the intent, as this isn't the first time I've come across the concept of why a dominant voice isn't included in a non-dominant conversation.
Thank you for being a part of this. I appreciate every voice in the struggle, and hope we have more and more conversations where all voices get their say.
~Xakara
My HAHAT Contribution Writing From the Middle: BiErasure & BiVisibility
Hello, Kimberly,
I wholeheartedly agree. Last year during the Hop I wrote about the dangers of viewing homophobic people as "the enemy". We need to change the world one mind at a time.
Thank you, Debby!
Personal preference is one thing - not everyone is interested in every type of fiction. What's important is realizing that each person is unique - but we are all human and we all love.
Hello, H.B.,
I don't mean to suggest that there's anything inherently wrong with preferring some kinds of fiction over others. When a reader is really rigidly against a sub-genre, though, I wonder whether that resistance really derives from fear.
Thanks, Xakara,
I can see your point. But really this hop isn't about "content" - it's about beliefs and prejudices. I feel as though excluding M/F authors perpetuates a division that shouldn't be there. When an author writes a M/F story, that's not necessarily a rejection of queer content or queer pairings. It's just one story out of many.
Hopping over to read your post now! Thanks again for your honest and thoughtful response.
Hi Lisabet,
I agree with Xakara about the phrase "reverse discrimination," but I agree with you that it's too bad that anyone has been excluded from participating in HAHAT. I think it would be better to require that prizes have some LGBTQ aspect--if an author doesn't have an appropriate story to give away, then they can offer to donate to an appropriate charity or something like that. The more the merrier (gayer?)! :)
As for reader genre preferences, I have no difficultly with that, at least when it comes to novels that depict sex explicitly. There aren't many pairings or groupings that I personally would find distasteful, but I can understand how that's not the same for everyone. And I certainly have arrangements that I *prefer*!
sophia-martin at hotmail dot com
Come visit my HAHAT post: http://sophia-martin.blogspot.com/2013/05/hahat-hop-against-homophobia-and.html
The hop and participants were explained to me in terms of getting queer authors and those who produce queer content to put a focus on the issue. If it was presented differently to you as purely about fighting orientation and gender phobia, then I understand why you're upset. If this was meant to be a general coming together, then everyone should have had a shot at being included. That's just not how it was expressed early on when I joined.
Wonderful! There is no such thing as reverse discrimination, nor black "racists" nor men suffering from sexual discrimination. In each case there in one group with privileges and benefits, who receive preferred treatment. Society is structured to maintain the benefits and privileges of the favored group. Individuals perpetuate discrimination, but its supported systematically: through laws, culture, and sheer habit. The publishing industry has a system that favors certain types of books over others. The favored books and their authors will never have to,worry about discrimination, because publishing is structured for their benefit. Everyone else has to fight their way in.
Urbanista
brendurbanist @gmail. com
Hi, Xakara,
Thank you! And I'm not really "upset", just wondering whether being more inclusive would ultimately increase the effectiveness.
I loved your post, by the way. Left a comment, but had to do so anonymously.
Hello, Sophia,
Thanks for your comment. Off to read your post!
Well personally, I know I'm a bit guilty of this reverse discrimination, albeit unintentionally. I don't mind F/F, I just prefer M/M. Same with M/F. And if I have a book that's mostly M/M, but contains M/F or F/F, it does influence my decision to read it. Now, the majority of what I read is M/M, but I also read and review other pairings, even if it's not my preference. I believe in trying everything at least three times. If you don't like it, okay, you've made an informed decision, no harm no foul. But you never know, you just might find out you like it.
tiger-chick-1(at)hotmail(dot)com
the three time rule is a good one, Emily. I primarily read MM but that's mostly because that's what I review, but I'm not adverse to reading other combinations.
lena.grey.iam@gmail.com
I have never read a f/f book it might be very interesting. I know I love reading m/m books. That's just about all I read anymore. Thank you for taking part in the hop!
sstrode at scrtc dot com
Thank you for the post.
peggy1984 at live dot com
I think even when groups of people have similar needs for acceptance, they will in-fight. I see it as putting the others down, so they can be more accepted themselves. Also it means they are just as ignorant and intolerant as homophobic people.
Thanks for participating in this great hop!
penumbrareads(at)gmail(dot)com
Hey Lisabet!
Anonymous or not, you won one of my giveaway copies! You didn't leave an email address, so please contact me at Xakara at Xakara dot com and let me know your ebook format of choice. The give away books is A Way To A Dragon's Heart, so please let me know if you already own or won it in a previous giveaway and I'll give you something else from my backlist.
~X
Thanks to all of you who commented. I've drawn the winners.
Emily gets the M/M anthology Gaymes.
Sherry gets the F/F story, Velvet.
And I'll donate $10 to the Lamda Legal Defense Fund in honor of Sophia.
Post a Comment
Let me know your thoughts! (And if you're having trouble commenting, try enabling third-party cookies in your browser...)